Guillaume de Vaulx, The Paradox of Creation. Theology of (De)nature and Physics of Worship in the 3ʳᵈ/9ᵗʰ Century Kalām and Falsafa, Quaderni di Studi Arabi, 18 (1-2), pp. 304-332.
Guillaume de Vaulx, “Arabic Zoology and the tasḫīr question”, Mélanges de l’Université saint Joseph, vol. 69, pp. 47-71.
Guillaume de Vaulx Doctor of Philosophy and IDEO member icon-calendar Tuesday December 12ᵗʰ, 2017 It is impossible to hold these three statements at the same time: 1) “God wants all people to be saved”, 2) “God shows people a path of salvation”, and 3) “Anyone who does not follow this path cannot be saved”. Either God wants the salvation for all, in which case He cannot impose only one path of salvation; or He imposes a particular path, in which case He risks that some will not follow it. And in any case, whatever the revealed path, it is only given to a given group, at a given time, condemning those who lived prior to or far from the place of this revelation. The author of Rasāʾil Iḫwān al-ṣafā, whom Guillaume de Vaulx believes to have discovered to be Aḥmad al-Ṭayyib al-Saraḫrsī (d. 286/899), offers an original solution within a Muslim context. For him, the world is built on complementary relationships: no one person can have all skills, per se. Rather, together, we have all skills. This principle of complementarity is valid not only in everyday life, but also for eternal salvation. individually, we cannot achieve salvation, but together, each according to his religion and beliefs, we are able to achieve salvation for all, because salvation is beyond what any of us can achieve alone.
Send him an email: g.de.vaulx@gmail.com Click here to see his bibliography. Click here to see his authority record and list of publications on Diamond. Guillaume de Vaulx is French and lives in Beirut. After completing two degrees in philosophy (CAPES and Agrégation), he lived in Saudi Arabia before settling in Egypt. In 2016, he defended his PhD thesis on the topic of the Epistles of the Brethren of Purity under the supervision of Professor Marwan Rashed (Paris-IV). He worked at the IDEO until 2018, before joining the IFPO in Beirut, where he continues his research, leading a project on “animals worshiping God above all else” funded by the French Ministry of the Interior, section of religious affairs. His research focus on the parallels between Arab and contemporary philosophy. Guillaume began his research by focusing on the history of classical Arabic thought (9ᵗʰ‒10ᵗʰ centuries) from al-Fārābī before devoting his doctorate to the question of wholeness in the Epistles of the Brethren of Purity, a systematic understanding of the work published in a summary book form in Arabic with commented translations in French. This understanding led him to reconsider the historical debates on the authorship of the work and to advance the hypothesis of their authorship by Aḥmad Ibn al-Ṭayyib al-Saraḫsī (d. 286/899), a disciple of al-Kindī (d. 252/866). His articles are mainly devoted to editing the remaining fragments of this author’s works. He is currently developing a reflection on animality in the classical Arab period, both from the point of view of fables (“The Animal Trial of Human Domination”), of zoology (“Trouble in the Genre, the Rhinoceros is a Bird. The Islamic Beginnings of Anthrozoology”) or the religious sciences (a project on animal piety). In contemporary philosophy, he worked for several years with Nibras Chehayed on the one hand to translate the philosophical lexicon into Arabic, and on the other hand to reflect on the contemporary world from what Arab cultural production has to say both about art (La destructivité en œuvres. Essai sur l’art syrien contemporain) and literature (La destructivité en personne : Chismah. Essai sur Ahmad Saadawi — forthcoming). Publications: مع نبراس شحيّد، التدميريّة تشكيليًّا: قراءاتٌ فلسفيّة في الفنّ السوريّ المعاصر، منشورات المعهد الفرنسيّ للشرق الأدنى، بيروت، ٢٠٢١، ٢٥١ صفحة. Le Procès animal de la domination humaine, Fable tirée des Épitres des Frères en Pureté (Rasāʾil Iḫwān al-ṣafā), Paris : Les Belles Lettres, 2021, 346 pages. Avec Nibras Chehayed, La destructivité en œuvres, essai sur l’art syrien contemporain, Beyrouth : Presses de l’Ifpo, 2021, 208 pages. « Trouble dans le genre : le rhinocéros est un oiseau ! Les débuts islamiques de l’anthropozoologie », Anthropozoologica 55 (18), 2020, pages 257‒268. « Dépassement de la dialectique laïcité v/s confessionnalisme », Travaux et jours (Université Saint-Joseph, Beyrouth), n°95 (décembre 2019): « Sécularisation – laïcité – confessionnalisme ». « Aḥmad b. al-Ṭayyib al-Saraḫsī, réviseur de L’introduction arithmétique de Nicomaque de Gérase et rédacteur des Rasāʾil Iḫwān al-ṣafā », Arabic Science and Philosophy, août 2019, pages 261‒283. « La civilisation et ses bêtes » comprenant une fiction interactive et des réécritures de la fable des animaux des Ikhwān al-ṣafā, hypotheses.org, juillet 2019. Les Épîtres des Frères en Pureté, mathématique et philosophie, Paris : Les Belles Lettres, 2019, 318 pages. كاترين كنسلر، (ترجمة جيوم دڤو)، ما العلمانيّة؟، المركز القوميّ للترجمة، القاهرة، ۲۰۱۷، ۱۰۹ صفحة. رسائل إخوان الصفا وخلان الوفا، سلسلة تيسير التراث، الهيئة العامة للكتاب، القاهرة ۲۰۱۷، ۲٤۱ صفحة. La bêtise des penseurs arabes dans Les cahiers de l’Islam, 1, 2015. Apprendre à philosopher avec Hannah Arendt, Ellipses, Paris, 2013, 240 pages. La Naqla : Étude du concept de transfert dans l’œuvre d’Al-Fārābi dans Arabic sciences and philosophy, 20, 2010, pages 125–176.
Have questions, feedback, or need assistance? Reach out to our dedicated team. We’re here to help you with any inquiries.
The Dominican Institute for Oriental Studies is a research institute dedicated to the study of Islamic heritage and medieval and contemporary Egypt in its religious and cultural dimensions.
